Archives of ISPRM

Sara Liguori1,2, Claudio Semplicini3, Adriana Gerardi4, Giuseppe Marcolin5, Fausto Antonio Panizzolo3, Francesca Gimigliano2

1Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
2Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
3Moveo Srl, None, Padova, Italy
4Synlab Cemes, None, Padova, Italy
5Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy

Keywords: Exoskeleton, gait, neurological disorder, orthosis, rehabilitation.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the ExoBand, a passive hip orthosis, in improving walking speed as part of a rehabilitation program for patients with neurological gait impairments.

Patients and methods: Between March 2022 and December 2022, a total of 25 adults with chronic neurological diseases affecting gait were included. The patients were assigned to either the intervention group (n = 13, Group A), who trained with the ExoBand, or the control group (n = 12, Group B). Both groups underwent 10 rehabilitation sessions over two or three weeks, including gait training on a treadmill and functional exercises. Gait speed was assessed pre- (T0) and post-intervention (T1) using the Walker View system.

Results: Of a total of 25 patients included in the study, 12 were male and 13 were female. The mean age was 57.2 ± 12.6 years in Group A and 56.1 ± 12.1 years in Group B, indicating no significant difference (p = 0.8). Both groups showed significant improvements in gait speed; however, the intervention group demonstrated a significantly greater increase (+14.2% vs. +8.6%, p < 0.05). No adverse events were reported. Additionally, 77% of ExoBand users expressed willingness to use it daily, while 100% would recommend it to other individuals.

Conclusion: The present study provides preliminary evidence supporting the use of the soft exoskeleton ExoBand as a potential effective rehabilitation tool for individuals with neurological disorders affecting gait. Our findings demonstrate that incorporating the ExoBand into a structured rehabilitation program leads to notable improvements in walking speed, aligning with the minimal clinically important difference for functional mobility enhancement. These results highlight the potential of passive wearable hip orthoses as a cost-effective and accessible alternative to more complex robotic-assisted gait rehabilitation methods.

Citation: Liguori S, Semplicini C, Gerardi A, Marcolin G, Panizzolo FA, Gimigliano F. The effectiveness of a passive hip exoskeleton in improving walking ability during the rehabilitation of patients with neurological conditions. Arch ISPRM 2026;1(2):163-170. https://doi.org/10.5606/archisprm.2026.38

Author Contributions

S.L., C.S., F.A.P., F.G.: Conceived the study idea and conceptualized the project; C.S., G.M., F.A.P.: Were responsible for the methodological design; F.A.P., F.G.: Provided overall control and supervision, critically reviewed the manuscript; S.L., C.S., A.G., G.M., F.A.P., F.G.: Data collection and processing were performed; C.S., G.M., F.A.P.: Data analysis and interpretation were carried out; S.L., C.S.: Conducted the literature review, compiled the references, and managed the funding, drafted the original manuscript; F.A.P., F.G.: Critically reviewed the manuscript; C.S., A.G., G.M., F.A.P.: Materials and resources were provided. All authors approved the final version of the article.

Conflict of Interest

A patent has been filed describing the ExoBand components documented in this manuscript; F.A.P. was author of this patent and is employed by Moveo srl, the entity that manufactures the ExoBand. C.S. holds employment with by Moveo srl. Beyond these disclosures, there are no further competing interests to declare.

Data Availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Financial Disclosure

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not‑for‑profit sectors.

AI Disclosure
The authors declare that artificial intelligence (AI) tools were not used, or were used solely for language editing, and had no role in data analysis, interpretation, or the formulation of conclusions. All scientific content, data interpretation, and conclusions are the sole responsibility of the authors. The authors further confirm that AI tools were not used to generate, fabricate, or ‘hallucinate’ references, and that all references have been carefully verified for accuracy.